国产人人色I色婷婷综合久久中文字幕雪峰I奇米色777欧美一区二区I久热久热aV爽青青在线I国产av喷水I国产伦精品一区二区三区免.费I高潮av在线Iww欧美一级I91天天看I黄a在线91I九一无码中文字幕久久无码色…I丰满国产精品视频二区

OPINION> FROM THE CHINESE PRESS
Unveil mysterious government bodies
(China Daily)
Updated: 2009-09-16 08:03

The 60th anniversary of the People's Republic of China this year is also the 60th anniversary of the State Council. Yet the latter has never had a signboard outside its office. It makes no difference whether or not the State Council does this, yet it has become an urgent need for some local governments to do so, says an article in Zhujiang Evening News. Excerpt:

The State Council refuses to have a signboard outside its office because of its location at Zhongnanhai. But when some local governments try to keep their offices secret, the reasons are fairly subtle.

Local governments, people's congresses and judicial authorities at all levels have posted their addresses and phone numbers on websites.

Related readings:
Unveil mysterious government bodies Digital China calls for central government funds for IT SMEs
Unveil mysterious government bodies Pilot program in Shenzhen lessens role of government
Unveil mysterious government bodies Government aid to Magna-led Opel draws European scrutiny

Some other public sector organizations, however, prefer to keep their signboards behind closed doors, cut off access through the Internet and reject having their numbers registered with the telephone directory.

People have only seen their names on TV but have no access to them, which only adds to their imagination about unofficial activities and furtive deals.

Premier Wen Jiabao has said the Sate Council should always keep its door open to the people, but what can Zhongnanhai do alone, when hundreds of grassroots governments turn a blind eye to the people?

In fact, it makes no difference whether the State Council puts up a signboard outside its office.

We are more interested in why some local government organizations do not want to reveal themselves. Is it because they lack authority, credibility or even legitimacy?

(China Daily 09/16/2009 page9)