国产人人色I色婷婷综合久久中文字幕雪峰I奇米色777欧美一区二区I久热久热aV爽青青在线I国产av喷水I国产伦精品一区二区三区免.费I高潮av在线Iww欧美一级I91天天看I黄a在线91I九一无码中文字幕久久无码色…I丰满国产精品视频二区

CHINA> National
China cracks down on tainted tableware
(Xinhua)
Updated: 2009-04-15 23:45

BEIJING - China's quality supervisor said Wednesday that it is organizing a new round of inspections on tableware containing melamine after finding use of poisonous materials in such products.

Started on Tuesday, the inspection will last until May 15 as a follow-up to a nationwide test on melamine tableware last December, said the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (GAQSIQ).

Related readings:
China cracks down on tainted tableware Dairy industry recovering from melamine scandal
China cracks down on tainted tableware China court accepts first lawsuit over melamine tainted milk
China cracks down on tainted tableware More officials sacked over melamine scandal

The clampdown will target unlicensed and unregistered melamine tableware makers and those who use urea formaldehyde resin, a substance that could produce carcinogenic chemicals when heated, and other illegal ingredients in production, said the GAQSIQ.

The watchdog said investigators had recently found some tableware manufactures using urea formaldehyde resin to produce tableware, a substitute for melamine, which is safe but more expensive.

Previous tests showed all melamine tableware made by legal manufacturers and sold in China's supermarkets and medium-and large-sized stores are safe, said the GAQSIQ in January.

Chinese media reported last December that 80 percent of melamine tableware sampled from five chain stores and eight wholesale markets in Beijing contained urea formaldehyde resins or other ingredients that were poisonous when heated.

Most reports cited the test results of the Hong Kong-registered International Food Packaging Association (IFPA) and the Beijing-based Kaifa Environment Protection Technology Consulting Center.

The two institutions were "incompetent and incapable" of conducting tests and their test samples, inspection procedures and conclusions were not scientific, said the GAQSIQ in January.